Playboy Won't Pay for Britney
If her embarrassing performance at the VMAs was any sort of indication of Britney Spears' future success then I think we can all say that a star has fallen. Should you need any tangible evidence of her decline, consider her latest PR disaster.The National Ledger reports that Playboy is only willing to shell out $400,000 to have Spears pose nude for a magazine feature. Britney insists that she won't take off her clothes for less than seven figures, a sum that has been scoffed at by editor/founder/whatever Hugh Hefner.
Boffo! Can we all just agree that this is good news?
Seriously, we've seen all there is to see of Britney Spears for free. The only thing Playboy could add to that is some air-brushing and good lighting, which would be a small improvement, but not enough to make up for the fact that no one out there wants to see that woman naked. (If I'm wrong about this, please let me know.)
You know that saying about how you can't put the toothpaste back into the tube? Well, I think that pretty much sums up Britney Spears.






flavio, 9-08-2008, 1:43PM
hello my name is flavio I am 16 years old live in mexico, sinaloa I like very much the program of play boy mansion and your also britney ere my idol I them love shaft to the moment this I them love all the women I die without them..
Sigh I leave my pure mail them sinaloa to and the song toxic this well chida greet to play boy mansion.
Reply »