You know what they say, if you can't do Playboy, do Maxim. Earlier this week, we reported Playboy editor Hugh Hefner turned down Britney Spears' request for a 7-figure payout to pose in his magazine.
Now Spears is now discussing the possibility of posing for the men's magazine Maxim. As a "close friend" put it to OK! Magazine, "She wants to be on the cover as quickly as they can shoot her. The last thing she did that really reminded America of her allure was her sexy Rolling Stone cover from October 2003, so the idea of another high-profile cover is completely logical."
Yeah, I get that ... because the completely logical thing to do when you're in the middle of a custody battle and a management crisis is to put a nearly naked picture of yourself on the cover of a mid-range men's magazine!
The irony is that a men's magazine cover isn't going to remind anybody of Britney's sexy appeal; it's just going to remind us that she's kind of pathetic, not desirable.