So that's what Lindsay Lohan looks like naked
Let's be real, if you want to see the more private areas of Lindsay Lohan, they're not that hard to find. Ever since she turned from sweet-faced child star to out-of-control, drugged-up twentysomething, her lady bits have routinely popped out and been plastered all over the Internet.But this is different. New York Magazine is running an artsy-fartsy shoot of LiLo today, in which the young starlet bares all for the camera. You might notice, however, that the actress doesn't look quite like herself.
And that's on purpose. The series is supposed to replicate a 1962 New York Magazine shoot that photographer Bert Stern did with Marilyn Monroe. As it turned out, those photos from the Hotel Bel-Air were the last (and arguably the most famous) photos ever taken of the original Blonde Bombshell. These more recent images (also shot by Stern), feature Lindsay in similarly provocotive poses -- and, while she's no Marilyn, she looks pretty damn good.
So how did the 21-year-old decide to strip down for the camera? She tells the magazine: "I didn't have to put that much thought into it."
Tags: celebrity, featured, lindsay lohan, LindsayLohan, marilyn monroe, MarilynMonroe, new york magazine, NewYorkMagazine






Heather, 2-20-2008, 1:17PM
I'm not trying to sound "catty" but, her body is gross. It looks like they put implants on a little boy's body. Nasty. She has guy nipples...you can see it even worse in the picture of her laying down. Not a smart move, removing your clothes, Miss Lohan. YUCK.
Reply »