Heidi Montag Wears Her Own Designs, Wants to Launch 'Low-End' and 'Couture' Fashion Lines
Heidi Montag in a dress she created. Photo: Chris Weeks, WireImage.com
After stepping out on a Las Vegas red carpet for a night club party in a sexy, form-fitting fuchsia dress (um, of her own design), Heidi Montag has announced yet another goal for the surgically enhanced "new me."
She wants to be a high/low fashion designer! Please, say it isn't sew.
Montag would like to create a "low end" clothing line so her fans can dress just like her. She also wants to design a small "couture" line, the reality star told People StyleWatch.
Newly designed herself, the now busty blonde packed four DIY dresses for a romantic Valentine's weekend with hubbie Spencer Pratt, and says she eventually wants to wear more of her own looks.
"This is just the beginning. I'd really love to eventually wear mostly my own designs. And I would really love to do a low end line [for my] fans and it can be really accessible and then a one of kind couture line to really showcase my creativity," she told the site.
Her inspirations? The classic and timeless Chanel and the sexy Dolce & Gabbana. (Clearly, that didn't quite come across in her first attempt.)
And we thought Montag's creativity was limited to her 10 cosmetic enhancements in one day.
Then again, with the way that reality stars like to extend their 15 minutes of fame, this might just work out well for Montag when her tenure at "The Hills" is over.
Maybe she could compete on, um, "Launch My Line" with another pair of DDs -- Dean and Dan Caten of DSquared2 fame.
Filed under: Fashion, Celebrity, News, Celebrity Style
Tags: celebrity fashion lines, dresses, Heidi Montag, plastic surgery, Reality Stars, The Hills
Tags: celebrity fashion lines, dresses, Heidi Montag, plastic surgery, Reality Stars, The Hills







Ashley, 2-23-2010, 10:35AM
haha; people now think they have to get plastic surgery, why? in a few years you'll regret it. besides shes not that pretty anymore. she looks rele old now! and ugly!
Reply »