No comment

This article is filled with pure rubbish. Women with BIG hips are no more likely to get cancer than women who don't have hips. Women can have breast cancers from other causes, but women who have big hips don't really have a big cancer risk. I am tired of reading such nonsense by phony researchers who have nothing better to do but make up nonsense that does not prove anything. Women who have big hips have nothing to do with estrogen production. Big hips tend to be distinguishable due to genetics and with women probably being big boned. Women have natural tendency to have big hips due to genetics and child bearing. And the other thing, women with small breasts don't feel natural, due to the fact that big breasts associates with milk production, not in terms of sexuality. Also, there are some women who have big breasts, but who are not obese. And some of the women who have small breasts are morbidly obese. So why are breast size and hip size of any importance? Unless, someone who have very little experience in that area of medical field who continue to allow this worthless garbage to be published at our expense.

The reason to why this article is greatly flawed that women who has small or narrow hips would still get breast cancer, so this article is just meaningless rubbish by someone who likes to rub one the wrong way. I would not advise this article to even be published by someone who is not only ignorant, but oblivious to some of the natural characteristics of each women whose large nose doesn't fit on one's face and that no matter what size the woman's body is, it doesn't attribute to any diseases one may face. Rather flaws, or no, women should have absolute pride in her appearance without being insulted by someone who can provide no real scientific facts to support their claims or link.

I have tiny ears and I can hear a flea f..t.
I have to wear earplugs and earmuffs just to get some sleep.

The article does NOT even talk about big thighs at all.

This article missed something VERY IMPORTANT.
Fat people do not get kidnapped.
We are too heavy to carry & too wide to fit in the trunk of a car.
They do not make enough rope to tie us with.
Handcuffs? They do not fit our chubby wrists.
We cannot be kept out of sight.
We will eat all of your food waiting for someone to pay randsom.
No one really wants us back.
So; if you are looking for a "flaw" that is good for your health, think FAT. Plus we are hard to kill with bullets.

A proverbial load of crap.

i have small breasts and surely they are not sensitive

What a hoot! Thanks for giving me the opportunity to laugh at my flaws.

What ever happened to "The Fleecing Of America"? I can not believe someone gets paid to do all these studies. Not to mention that they are done over and over and the results depend more on who is paying for the study to be done which is why one day coffee is good for us, then next day it isnt. How many years can they study the effects of red hair dye, and who cares. My sister got a year off from work and got paid to study the effects of red wine. Spent it traveling to vineyards tasting wine and writing a paper about it. These used to be called opinions, and they were FREE.

Women who have great personalities, who are warm and friendly, and cool with their bodies regardless of size, shape, etc, are more likely to be loved for themselves more than anything else.

correlation does not mean causation... if you are going to get a disease you are going to get a disease, it doesnt matter what you look like cancer is pretty indiscriminate once you get past a certain age. Get checked for things, thats how you catch and stop them early.