ever heard of photo-shop? do you think they will show any marks on her? how silly can you get...

Henry, you need to read the article prior to commenting. They addressed the photoshop question.
I think it is simply that if you are 8 feet tall, you can carry your weight over more area. Therefore, I am not fat, I am simply too short!

That is SOOOOO not fair!!!

z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z.........

Sticks don't jiggle, or wiggle you moron, they pretty much rattle. Atleast the ones in A&P did. I've seen pics of her body where she closely resembles the A&P skeletons in my opinion. Sorry but I do not see the twiggy appeal. I was skinny for years and hated it, 5'7" 115lbs-120lbs on a good day. What some found attractive was disgusting to me. At 45 with two kids under 10 and a weight of 135 I feel great. It's sad that we live in a world where looking like a skeleton is considered good. I now have a duaghter, she's far from a size one. I hope by the time she turns 18 twiggies will be replaced with average size women but I doubt it.

Bitch. Oops! I meant doesn't she really look great? No, no, I didn't either. She is lovely and if I can't look like that, it might as well be her! Nope, still lying. Gee, now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure I meant bitch. But I mean it in the kindest way! Well, now that I think about it....

Doesn't matter a bit what is or isn't done to her photos. Fact remains.....she is beautiful, it's just that simple. I can't imagine many people not agreeing. And, for those who don't think so...well, I'll be nice, only because I'm in a good mood today!

Also, she and her family seem like real nice people. Love, love, love her hubby.

(If my own is reading this......you're hotter babe!)

Giselle may be blessed with some good genetics, but .... it takes prenatal & postpartum exercise and obviously looking at her skin, super healthy nutrition. This is one healthy girl .
As a prenatal fitness expert, my clients who gets into this kind of fabulous shape within a month or two post baby, has had some serious exercise background, ie: ballet, running, an olympic athlete...etc...
This makes the case for all women to exercise from a very young age for long term benefits. Women without a serious athletic background will take at least 6 months to look this good post baby with exercise and nutrition. This is not an exception - most moms could look great if given the chance.... expectingfitness com

to Angelbaby: Oh my god, roflmao. Good for you for voicing what every woman is probably thinking righ now, but not saying.

She is indeed a beautiful woman and she did eat and exercise right before her baby was born BUT I am concerned that it again shows young woman who are pregnant, work every day, not rich, and do not have their photos taken by professionals that not looking like this means something is wrong with them. I read where a growing percentage of babies are being born with a lower birth weight because young mothers are worried about how much weight they gain. Gisele is amazing but I wish she would let young girls know that this is not always possible to look like this. Stretch marks, especially, are hereditary and some women get them much worse than others. I do poe this beautiful picture was not air-brushed, that would be a huge disappointment.

Thank god for makeup since she is the fugliest model there is! Oh yes, mother of the year who claimed that she wants to be and is a fulltime Mom--what a crock. As far as Tom goes..he has become a real PWhipped wuss--he used to be a great QB and handsome...now, he sucks as at football and what is with his Justin Bieber hairdo?? They both make me sick---he fathered a child with Bridget that he rarely sees and Bundchen only had a baby to keep him.

I wish the Pats would dump him.

From the boobs down her body looks like a 12 year old boy. There is NOTHING curvaceous about her at all except her boobs. That's why her body is so unusual. Normally, people with no curves are completely flat chested. But her hip curves are usually computer generated.

Yes, she looks good but she's very thin. Getting back in shape within three months of having a first baby is no miracle, lots of women do it. And she has more money and time to work out than "most" women.

The photo may not be photoshopped, but I'm sure she is wearing makeup.

This is not a big deal.

First of all let me say that I think that Gisele is very beautiful and it's wonderful that she looks like this after having a baby. But it's articles and photos like this that contribute to the seemingly world-wide preoccupation with weight and body image that's eating away at women's self esteem. We're no longer allowed to just be and let ourselves enjoy eating and sedentary pastimes like reading or watching tv. No, we have to diet and exercise all the time just to live up to some manufactured ideal of what women are supposed to look like and now we can't even let ourselves go during pregnancy because God forbid we might actually gain weight.

Could someone please explain what the point of this article is? Is it designed to make normal women feel ashamed that they do not/can not look like that? I mean really! We're bombarded with photos of models with impossibly thin bodies and 19 year olds touting age defying facial products. It is all so silly and insulting. So she looks great after giving birth. What kind of person is she? Does she go out of her way to help others? Is she kind to strangers? Is she loving to her husband? Her body and face WILL most assuredly age and sag. Then what? The eternal, never ending quest for youth in surgery? How pathetic and shallow.

OH HERE WE GO TIME TO PICK ON MR & MRS BRADY ...YOU HAVE TO BE JOKEING OR COULD YOU BE VERY JELOUSE .YOU ALL WISH YOU COULD LIKE AS WELL AS SHE DOES ...
GET A LIFE

My bag hurts

A yummy mommy!

Sorry, in my opinion she looks like a skinny 17 year-old boy, which I do not find sexy. I want to see curves on a woman. This idolization of anorexic looking models is silly (at least to me)